The UN nuclear agency condemns Iran for preventing inspectors

 

Iran's nuclear program has taken yet another perplexing turn, drawing the attention of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Iran's recent actions, deemed "disproportionate and unprecedented," have triggered sharp criticism from the IAEA's chief, Rafael Grossi.

Iran's move, which effectively bars many of the agency's most seasoned inspectors from overseeing its nuclear activities, has mired the monitoring process in confusion and uncertainty. This puzzling development was triggered in response to a call by the IAEA's Board of Governors, led by the United States, Britain, France, and Germany. Their request pertained to the mysterious traces of uranium discovered at undisclosed sites within Iran.

Grossi's condemnation of Iran's actions, however, underscores his belief that Iran's response might be an overreaction. He articulated this view with clarity, stating, "I strongly condemn this unprecedented and disproportionate unilateral action." His statement highlights the disruption caused to the agency's verification activities in Iran, which openly contradicts the principles of cooperation that should ideally exist between the agency and Iran.

These events unfold against a backdrop of longstanding tensions between Iran and the IAEA. The agency's primary mission is to oversee Iran's nuclear program, a program that has long been the subject of suspicion in Western circles, with allegations that it harbors ambitions of nuclear weaponry. In contrast, Iran maintains steadfastly that its nuclear pursuits are entirely peaceful.

Iran's recent move, referred to as "condolence" by inspectors, is, in essence, a permitted action. Member States generally retain the authority to veto inspectors designated to visit their nuclear facilities, an authority granted under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and safeguards agreements with the inspection agency. Nonetheless, the IAEA contends that Iran's decision deviates from the norm, citing Iran's communication of its intention to block "several" inspectors without specifying the exact number.

The IAEA highlights that the affected inspectors are among the agency's most seasoned experts, possessing unique knowledge of enrichment technology. Consequently, Iran's decision has had the effect of sidelining a substantial portion of the agency's core group of experienced inspectors designated for Iran.

Iran's Foreign Ministry has, in response, linked this move to perceived political maneuvering by the United States and three European nations. This linkage suggests an attempt to exploit the situation "for their own political purposes," raising questions about the motives of Britain, France, and Germany, who recently declared their intent to maintain sanctions on Iran related to nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Nasser Kanani alluded to Iran's earlier warnings about the repercussions of political excesses and the potential politicization of the agency's environment. He concluded with an assertion that Iran would maintain positive cooperation within the framework of existing agreements and reiterated the importance of the agency's neutrality.

A Vienna-based diplomat disclosed that Iran had withdrawn its designation of all French and German members of the IAEA inspection team. Notably, there were no American or British members in the team.

The IAEA's recent report indicates Iran's reduction in the pace of uranium enrichment, a move that was interpreted as an attempt to de-escalate tensions in its long-standing standoff with the United States.

Iran and the United States are engaged in negotiations concerning a prisoner swap and the release of Iranian assets frozen in South Korea. This diplomatic development starts with the 2015 agreement between world powers and Iran, where limitations on uranium enrichment were traded for economic sanctions relief. However, the abrupt withdrawal of the United States from the accord in 2018 and Iran's subsequent non-compliance have made this an enduring enigma. The formal talks in Vienna, aimed at resurrecting the agreement, dissolved into confusion and uncertainty in August 2022.